[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241022135447.391b6f59@device-21.home>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 13:54:47 +0200
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: phylink: simplify SFP PHY attachment
Hello Russell,
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 12:39:06 +0100
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These two patches simplify how we attach SFP PHYs.
>
> The first patch notices that at the two sites where we call
> sfp_select_interface(), if that fails, we always print the same error.
> Move this into its own function.
>
> The second patch adds an additional level of validation, checking that
> the returned interface is one that is supported by the MAC/PCS.
>
> The last patch simplifies how SFP PHYs are attached, reducing the
> number of times that we do validation in this path.
>
> drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
It looks like the patches didn't make it through, there're also not on
lore nor patchwork :(
Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists