[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241022173605.qg4lfkwfqi4zju5m@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:36:05 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@...rochip.com>,
Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/6] net: sched: propagate "skip_sw" flag to
offload for flower and matchall
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 06:59:12PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Possibly a stupid question given I don't remember all the details of the
> TC offload, but is there a reason not to put the 'skip_sw' indication in
> 'struct flow_cls_common_offload' and initialize the new field as part of
> tc_cls_common_offload_init()?
>
> Seems like it won't require patching every classifier and will also work
> for the re-offload case (e.g., fl_reoffload())?
I think you forgot more about tc than I ever knew. The answer isn't
more complicated than "I didn't think about it". I've tested this
simpler proposal and will send v3 using it. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists