netdev - Re: [PATCH net 2/2] netfilter: xtables: fix typo causing some targets not to load on IPv6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024102259-armadillo-riveter-0e7d@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:44:19 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, fw@...len.de,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] netfilter: xtables: fix typo causing some
 targets not to load on IPv6

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 09:39:38AM +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> [CCing Greg and the stable list, to ensure he is aware of this, as well
> as the regressions list]
> 
> On 21.10.24 11:45, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > - There is no NFPROTO_IPV6 family for mark and NFLOG.
> > - TRACE is also missing module autoload with NFPROTO_IPV6.
> > 
> > This results in ip6tables failing to restore a ruleset. This issue has been
> > reported by several users providing incomplete patches.
> > 
> > Very similar to Ilya Katsnelson's patch including a missing chunk in the
> > TRACE extension.
> > 
> > Fixes: 0bfcb7b71e73 ("netfilter: xtables: avoid NFPROTO_UNSPEC where needed")
> > [...]
> 
> Just FYI as the culprit recently hit various stable series (v6.11.4,
> v6.6.57, v6.1.113, v5.15.168) quite a few reports came in that look like
> issues that might be fixed by this to my untrained eyes. I suppose they
> won't tell you anything new and maybe you even have seen them, but on
> the off-chance that this might not be the case you can find them here:
> 
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219397
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219402
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219409

Is this commit in linux-next yet?  I looked yesterday but couldn't find
it anywhere...

thanks,

greg k-h