[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241023-precious-gorgeous-taipan-4e0ad1@leitao>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 02:33:22 -0700
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, kernel-team@...a.com,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: Implement fault injection forcing skb
reallocation
On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 12:28:03AM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2024年10月14日(月) 22:50 Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>:
> > +static int __init skb_realloc_setup(char *str)
> > +{
> > + return setup_fault_attr(&skb_realloc.attr, str);
> > +}
> > +__setup("skb_realloc=", skb_realloc_setup);
>
> The documentation says "fail_net_force_skb_realloc=" boot option,
> but this code seems to add "skb_realloc=" boot option.
>
> I don't have a strong opinion about the naming, but I feel like
> it's a bit long. How about "fail_skb_realloc="?
>
> The same goes for the debugfs directory name.
>
> Reviewed-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Thanks. I will update and spin a new version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists