netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1 1/3] pldmfw: selected component update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fd443617-0460-4c44-84a1-3563c0c76033@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:07:06 +0200
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To: Konrad Knitter <konrad.knitter@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, jacob.e.keller@...el.com,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...nulli.us, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
 przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1 1/3] pldmfw: selected
 component update

Dear Konrad,


Thank you for your patch.

Am 23.10.24 um 12:07 schrieb Konrad Knitter:
> Enable update of a selected component.

It’d be great if you used that for the summary/title to make it a 
statement (by adding a verb in imperative mood).

It’d be great, if you elaborated, what that feature is, and included the 
documentation used for the implementation. Also, how can it be tested?

> Reviewed-by: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Knitter <konrad.knitter@...el.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/pldmfw.h | 8 ++++++++
>   lib/pldmfw/pldmfw.c    | 8 ++++++++
>   2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/pldmfw.h b/include/linux/pldmfw.h
> index 0fc831338226..f5047983004f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pldmfw.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pldmfw.h
> @@ -125,9 +125,17 @@ struct pldmfw_ops;
>    * a pointer to their own data, used to implement the device specific
>    * operations.
>    */
> +
> +enum pldmfw_update_mode {
> +	PLDMFW_UPDATE_MODE_FULL,
> +	PLDMFW_UPDATE_MODE_SINGLE_COMPONENT,
> +};
> +
>   struct pldmfw {
>   	const struct pldmfw_ops *ops;
>   	struct device *dev;
> +	u16 component_identifier;
> +	enum pldmfw_update_mode mode;
>   };
>   
>   bool pldmfw_op_pci_match_record(struct pldmfw *context, struct pldmfw_record *record);
> diff --git a/lib/pldmfw/pldmfw.c b/lib/pldmfw/pldmfw.c
> index 6e1581b9a616..6264e2013f25 100644
> --- a/lib/pldmfw/pldmfw.c
> +++ b/lib/pldmfw/pldmfw.c
> @@ -481,9 +481,17 @@ static int pldm_parse_components(struct pldmfw_priv *data)
>   		component->component_data = data->fw->data + offset;
>   		component->component_size = size;
>   
> +		if (data->context->mode == PLDMFW_UPDATE_MODE_SINGLE_COMPONENT &&
> +		    data->context->component_identifier != component->identifier)
> +			continue;
> +
>   		list_add_tail(&component->entry, &data->components);
>   	}
>   
> +	if (data->context->mode == PLDMFW_UPDATE_MODE_SINGLE_COMPONENT &&
> +	    list_empty(&data->components))
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
>   	header_crc_ptr = data->fw->data + data->offset;
>   
>   	err = pldm_move_fw_offset(data, sizeof(data->header_crc));


Kind regards,

Paul