netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: pcs: xpcs: yet more cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZxjbPkQEOr0FBTc6@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:17:18 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: pcs: xpcs: yet more cleanups

On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 12:52:17PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've found yet more potential for cleanups in the XPCS driver.
> 
> The first patch switches to using generic register definitions.
> 
> Next, there's an overly complex bit of code in xpcs_link_up_1000basex()
> which can be simplified down to a simple if() statement.
> 
> Then, rearrange xpcs_link_up_1000basex() to separate out the warnings
> from the functional bit.
> 
> Next, realising that the functional bit is just the helper function we
> already have and are using in the SGMII version of this function,
> switch over to that.
> 
> We can now see that xpcs_link_up_1000basex() and xpcs_link_up_sgmii()
> are basically functionally identical except for the warnings, so merge
> the two functions.
> 
> Next, xpcs_config_usxgmii() seems misnamed, so rename it to follow the
> established pattern.
> 
> Lastly, "return foo();" where foo is a void function and the function
> being returned from is also void is a weird programming pattern.
> Replace this with something more conventional.
> 
> With these changes, we see yet another reduction in the amount of
> code in this driver.
> 
>  drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.h |  12 ----
>  2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)

It's been almost a week, and this series has not been applied. First,
Jakub's NIPA bot failed to spot the cover message that patchwork picked
up - not my problem.

Now, I find that patchwork says "changes requested". What changes? No
one has replied asking for any changes to this series. Serge did
reply saying he would test it, and he has now done so, and replied
with his tested-by.

So, marking this series as "changes requested" is entirely incorrect.

If you think changes are required, please say what they are, or if no
changes are required, please apply this series.

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!