[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d3c3c6b5-499a-4890-9829-ae39022fec87@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 13:56:35 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Zhang Zekun <zhangzekun11@...wei.com>
Cc: justin.chen@...adcom.com, florian.fainelli@...adcom.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, o.rempel@...gutronix.de,
kory.maincent@...tlin.com, horms@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
chenjun102@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net: bcmasp: Add missing of_node_get() before
of_find_node_by_name()
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 09:59:08AM +0800, Zhang Zekun wrote:
> of_find_node_by_name() will decrease the refcount of the device_node.
> So, get the device_node before passing to it.
This seems like an odd design. Why does it decrement the reference
count?
Rather than adding missing of_node_get() everywhere, should we be
thinking about the design and fixing it to be more logical?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists