| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <mb61po738bigw.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 10:11:11 +0000
From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Helge Deller
<deller@....de>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "James E.J. Bottomley"
<James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf: bpf_csum_diff: optimize and
homogenize for all archs
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> writes:
> Hi Puranjay,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Puranjay-Mohan/net-checksum-move-from32to16-to-generic-header/20241023-234347
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241023153922.86909-3-puranjay%40kernel.org
> patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf: bpf_csum_diff: optimize and homogenize for all archs
> config: i386-randconfig-061-20241025 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241025/202410251552.LR73LP4V-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241025/202410251552.LR73LP4V-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410251552.LR73LP4V-lkp@intel.com/
>
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> net/core/filter.c:1423:39: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct sock_filter const *filter @@ got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter @@
> net/core/filter.c:1423:39: sparse: expected struct sock_filter const *filter
> net/core/filter.c:1423:39: sparse: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter
> net/core/filter.c:1501:39: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct sock_filter const *filter @@ got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter @@
> net/core/filter.c:1501:39: sparse: expected struct sock_filter const *filter
> net/core/filter.c:1501:39: sparse: got struct sock_filter [noderef] __user *filter
> net/core/filter.c:2321:45: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr @@ got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh @@
> net/core/filter.c:2321:45: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] daddr
> net/core/filter.c:2321:45: sparse: got unsigned int [usertype] ipv4_nh
> net/core/filter.c:10993:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_filter_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11000:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_filter_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11004:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'tc_cls_act_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11013:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'tc_cls_act_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11017:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'xdp_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11029:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_skb_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11035:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_skb_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11039:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_in_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11045:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_in_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11049:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_out_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11055:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_out_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11059:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_xmit_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11066:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_xmit_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11070:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_seg6local_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11076:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lwt_seg6local_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11079:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11085:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11088:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_addr_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11094:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'cg_sock_addr_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11097:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sock_ops_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11103:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sock_ops_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11106:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_skb_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11113:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_skb_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11116:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_msg_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11123:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_msg_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11126:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'flow_dissector_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11132:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'flow_dissector_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11460:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_reuseport_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11466:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_reuseport_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11668:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_lookup_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:11672:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sk_lookup_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
> net/core/filter.c:1931:43: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
> net/core/filter.c:1931:43: sparse: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff
> net/core/filter.c:1931:43: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
> net/core/filter.c:1934:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
> net/core/filter.c:1934:36: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] old
> net/core/filter.c:1934:36: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
> net/core/filter.c:1934:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
> net/core/filter.c:1934:42: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] new
> net/core/filter.c:1934:42: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
> net/core/filter.c:1937:36: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
> net/core/filter.c:1937:36: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from
> net/core/filter.c:1937:36: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
> net/core/filter.c:1937:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
> net/core/filter.c:1937:42: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to
> net/core/filter.c:1937:42: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
> net/core/filter.c:1982:59: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
> net/core/filter.c:1982:59: sparse: expected restricted __wsum [usertype] diff
> net/core/filter.c:1982:59: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
> net/core/filter.c:1985:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
> net/core/filter.c:1985:52: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] from
> net/core/filter.c:1985:52: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
> net/core/filter.c:1985:58: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
> net/core/filter.c:1985:58: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] to
> net/core/filter.c:1985:58: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
> net/core/filter.c:1988:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] from @@
> net/core/filter.c:1988:52: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] from
> net/core/filter.c:1988:52: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] from
> net/core/filter.c:1988:58: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to @@ got unsigned long long [usertype] to @@
> net/core/filter.c:1988:58: sparse: expected restricted __be32 [usertype] to
> net/core/filter.c:1988:58: sparse: got unsigned long long [usertype] to
>>> net/core/filter.c:2023:48: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int sum @@ got restricted __wsum @@
> net/core/filter.c:2023:48: sparse: expected unsigned int sum
> net/core/filter.c:2023:48: sparse: got restricted __wsum
> net/core/filter.c:2026:52: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int sum @@ got restricted __wsum @@
> net/core/filter.c:2026:52: sparse: expected unsigned int sum
> net/core/filter.c:2026:52: sparse: got restricted __wsum
> net/core/filter.c:2029:40: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int sum @@ got restricted __wsum @@
> net/core/filter.c:2029:40: sparse: expected unsigned int sum
> net/core/filter.c:2029:40: sparse: got restricted __wsum
> net/core/filter.c:2031:16: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long long @@ got restricted __wsum [usertype] seed @@
> net/core/filter.c:2031:16: sparse: expected unsigned long long
> net/core/filter.c:2031:16: sparse: got restricted __wsum [usertype] seed
> net/core/filter.c:2053:35: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@ expected unsigned long long @@ got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum @@
> net/core/filter.c:2053:35: sparse: expected unsigned long long
> net/core/filter.c:2053:35: sparse: got restricted __wsum [usertype] csum
>
> vim +2023 net/core/filter.c
>
> 2009
> 2010 BPF_CALL_5(bpf_csum_diff, __be32 *, from, u32, from_size,
> 2011 __be32 *, to, u32, to_size, __wsum, seed)
> 2012 {
> 2013 /* This is quite flexible, some examples:
> 2014 *
> 2015 * from_size == 0, to_size > 0, seed := csum --> pushing data
> 2016 * from_size > 0, to_size == 0, seed := csum --> pulling data
> 2017 * from_size > 0, to_size > 0, seed := 0 --> diffing data
> 2018 *
> 2019 * Even for diffing, from_size and to_size don't need to be equal.
> 2020 */
> 2021
> 2022 if (from_size && to_size)
>> 2023 return csum_from32to16(csum_sub(csum_partial(to, to_size, seed),
> 2024 csum_partial(from, from_size, 0)));
> 2025 if (to_size)
> 2026 return csum_from32to16(csum_partial(to, to_size, seed));
> 2027
> 2028 if (from_size)
> 2029 return csum_from32to16(~csum_partial(from, from_size, ~seed));
> 2030
> 2031 return seed;
> 2032 }
> 2033
This file has a lot of such sparse warnings. Specifically, to fix the
warning introduced by me, I can apply the following diff:
--- >8 ---
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index e00bec7de9ed..b94037f29b2a 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -2019,16 +2019,18 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_csum_diff, __be32 *, from, u32, from_size,
* Even for diffing, from_size and to_size don't need to be equal.
*/
+ __wsum ret = seed;
+
if (from_size && to_size)
- return csum_from32to16(csum_sub(csum_partial(to, to_size, seed),
- csum_partial(from, from_size, 0)));
+ ret = csum_sub(csum_partial(to, to_size, seed), csum_partial(from, from_size, 0));
+
if (to_size)
- return csum_from32to16(csum_partial(to, to_size, seed));
+ ret = csum_partial(to, to_size, seed);
if (from_size)
- return csum_from32to16(~csum_partial(from, from_size, ~seed));
+ ret = ~csum_partial(from, from_size, ~seed);
- return seed;
+ return csum_from32to16((__force unsigned int)ret);
}
--- 8< ---
If others feel that fixing these warnings is useful, I can send another
version with above diff. I will then also send a separate patch to fix
all other such warnings in this file.
Thanks,
Puranjay
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (256 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists