[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PAXPR04MB85102CA53AC88F5C9B8CEAF0884F2@PAXPR04MB8510.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 02:24:59 +0000
From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com"
<edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org"
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>, Clark Wang
<xiaoning.wang@....com>, Frank Li <frank.li@....com>,
"christophe.leroy@...roup.eu" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "bhelgaas@...gle.com"
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, "horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "alexander.stein@...tq-group.com"
<alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 net-next 05/13] net: enetc: extract common ENETC PF
parts for LS1028A and i.MX95 platforms
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 02:53:20PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> > index c26bd66e4597..92a26b09cf57 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> > @@ -58,3 +58,16 @@ struct enetc_pf {
> > int enetc_msg_psi_init(struct enetc_pf *pf);
> > void enetc_msg_psi_free(struct enetc_pf *pf);
> > void enetc_msg_handle_rxmsg(struct enetc_pf *pf, int mbox_id, u16
> *status);
> > +
> > +void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8
> *addr);
> > +void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
> > + const u8 *addr);
> > +int enetc_pf_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *ndev, void *addr);
> > +int enetc_setup_mac_addresses(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf
> *pf);
> > +void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
> > + const struct net_device_ops *ndev_ops);
> > +int enetc_mdiobus_create(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct device_node *node);
> > +void enetc_mdiobus_destroy(struct enetc_pf *pf);
> > +int enetc_phylink_create(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, struct device_node
> *node,
> > + const struct phylink_mac_ops *ops);
> > +void enetc_phylink_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv);
>
> Could you put the prototypes of functions exported by enetc_pf_common.c
> into a header named enetc_pf_common.h? It should be self-contained, i.e.
> a dummy C file with just #include "enetc_pf_common.h" in it should compile
> fine.
>
Sure, I'll add a new header file.
> I know the enetc driver isn't there yet when it comes to thoroughly
> respecting that, but for code we touch now, we should try to follow it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists