lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce2892c4-f759-40ca-a188-11a83b0164b3@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:57:29 +0100
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, kuba@...nel.org, horms@...nel.org,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: thepacketgeek@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davej@...emonkey.org.uk, vlad.wing@...il.com,
 max@...sevol.com, kernel-team@...a.com, aehkn@...hub.one,
 Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
 "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: netconsole: selftests: Change the IP
 subnet

Hi Breno,

On 28/10/2024 16:48, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Use a less populated IP range to run the tests, as suggested by Petr in
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/87ikvukv3s.fsf@nvidia.com/.

It looks like this is the same version as the one you sent on Friday,
without the modification suggested by Petr:

  https://lore.kernel.org/20241025161415.238215-1-leitao@debian.org

I supposed these new patches have been sent by accident, right?

(BTW: it is often better to include a cover letter when there is more
than one patch: some CIs might not take patches sent without it.)

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ