[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dee9769f-d86b-471f-bbe2-f0165489618c@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:26:44 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
dsahern@...nel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, kadlec@...filter.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, pablo@...filter.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
joel.granados@...nel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, kees@...nel.org,
mcgrof@...nel.org, ij@...nel.org, ncardwell@...gle.com,
koen.de_schepper@...ia-bell-labs.com, g.white@...leLabs.com,
ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com, mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com,
cheshire@...le.com, rs.ietf@....at, Jason_Livingood@...cast.com,
vidhi_goel@...le.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 14/14] net: sysctl: introduce sysctl
SYSCTL_FIVE
On 10/21/24 23:59, chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com wrote:
> From: Chia-Yu Chang <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com>
>
> Add SYSCTL_FIVE for new AccECN feedback modes of net.ipv4.tcp_ecn.
How many sysctl entries will use such value? If just one you are better
off not introducing the new sysctl value and instead using a static
constant in the tcp code.
Also this patch makes the commit message in the previous one incorrect.
Please adjust that.
Side note: on new version, you should include the changelog in the
affected patches, after a '---' separator, to help the reviewers.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists