netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC 10/10] mm: page_frag: add an entry in MAINTAINERS for page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241029073359.758d9b84@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 07:33:59 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Cc: <davem@...emloft.net>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Alexander Duyck
 <alexander.duyck@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 10/10] mm: page_frag: add an entry in MAINTAINERS
 for page_frag

On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:40:08 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> On 2024/10/29 7:27, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:58:50 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:  
> >> +M:	Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>  
> > 
> > Why is this line still here? You asked for a second opinion
> > and you got one from Paolo.  
> 
> Because of the reason below?
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/159495c8-71be-4a11-8c49-d528e8154841@huawei.com/

What is the reason in that link? You try to argue that the convention
doesn't exist or that your case is different? The maintainer tells you
their opinion in context of the posting.

It seems like you're more motivated by getting into MAINTAINERS than
by the work itself :/