netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 5/5] net: dsa: microchip: add support for side MDIO interface in LAN937x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZyBvjGrSb0uKELwm@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 06:15:56 +0100
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To: Arun.Ramadoss@...rochip.com
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, olteanv@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	kuba@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk, kernel@...gutronix.de,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 5/5] net: dsa: microchip: add support for
 side MDIO interface in LAN937x

Hi Arun,

On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 03:39:33AM +0000, Arun.Ramadoss@...rochip.com wrote:
> Hi Oleksij,
> 
> On Sat, 2024-10-26 at 08:35 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> > know the content is safe
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/lan937x_main.c
> > b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/lan937x_main.c
> > index 824d9309a3d35..7dfd21d0d2843 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/lan937x_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/lan937x_main.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,47 @@
> >  #include "ksz9477.h"
> >  #include "lan937x.h"
> > 
> > +static const u8 lan9370_phy_addr[] = {
> > +       [0] = 2, /* Port 1, T1 AFE0 */
> > +       [1] = 3, /* Port 2, T1 AFE1 */
> > +       [2] = 5, /* Port 3, T1 AFE3 */
> > +       [3] = 6, /* Port 4, T1 AFE4 */
> > +       [4] = U8_MAX, /* Port 5, RGMII 2 */
> > +};
> > +
> 
> Is it intentional to not to add support for lan9371 variant switch?

I forgot about this one, will add it too.

Regards,
Oleksij
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |