lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bda38b6e-73df-4ca5-8606-b4701a4db482@stanley.mountain>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:19:58 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 6/9] ice: use <linux/packing.h> for Tx and Rx
 queue context data

Always just ignore the tool when it if it's not useful.

CHECK_PACKED_FIELDS_ macros are just build time asserts, right?  I can easily
just hard code Smatch to ignore CHECK_PACKED_FIELDS_* macros.  I'm just going to
go ahead an do that in the ugliest way possible.  If we have a lot of these then
I'll do it properly.

regards,
dan carpenter


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ