[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241030121046.ojd7zx3jbyg4l4iq@skbuf>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:10:46 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, xfr@...look.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 3/6] net: stmmac: Refactor FPE functions to
generic version
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 01:36:12PM +0800, Furong Xu wrote:
> +bool stmmac_fpe_supported(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
> +{
> + return (priv->dma_cap.fpesel && priv->fpe_cfg.reg);
> +}
Should we also add the condition that stmmac_ops :: fpe_map_preemption_class()
is implemented? For future implementers to figure out what they need.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists