[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F9E73DD2-B898-440D-B35D-B6B10B8BC0E9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:01:07 +0200
From: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, chandrashekar.devegowda@...el.com,
chiranjeevi.rapolu@...ux.intel.com, haijun.liu@...iatek.com,
m.chetan.kumar@...ux.intel.com, ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com,
loic.poulain@...aro.org, johannes@...solutions.net, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: ruanjinjie@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: wwan: t7xx: Fix off-by-one error in t7xx_dpmaif_rx_buf_alloc()
On October 29, 2024 2:56:00 PM, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com> wrote:
>The error path in t7xx_dpmaif_rx_buf_alloc(), free and unmap the already
>allocated and mapped skb in a loop, but the loop condition terminates when
>the index reaches zero, which fails to free the first allocated skb at
>index zero.
>
>Check for >= 0 so that skb at index 0 is freed as well.
>
>Fixes: d642b012df70 ("net: wwan: t7xx: Add data path interface")
>Suggested-by: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>
>Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Jakub, when applying, could you drop that suggested-by tag, please. My contribution was only a small suggestion to avoid an endless loop. In all other meanings this patch is original work made by Jinjie, and all creds should go to him.
Besides that tag:
Acked-by: Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>
>---
>v2:
>- Update the commit title.
>- Declare i as signed to avoid the endless loop.
>---
> drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_dpmaif_rx.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_dpmaif_rx.c b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_dpmaif_rx.c
>index 210d84c67ef9..45e7833965b1 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_dpmaif_rx.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_dpmaif_rx.c
>@@ -166,8 +166,8 @@ int t7xx_dpmaif_rx_buf_alloc(struct dpmaif_ctrl *dpmaif_ctrl,
> const unsigned int q_num, const unsigned int buf_cnt,
> const bool initial)
> {
>- unsigned int i, bat_cnt, bat_max_cnt, bat_start_idx;
>- int ret;
>+ unsigned int bat_cnt, bat_max_cnt, bat_start_idx;
>+ int ret, i;
>
> if (!buf_cnt || buf_cnt > bat_req->bat_size_cnt)
> return -EINVAL;
>@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ int t7xx_dpmaif_rx_buf_alloc(struct dpmaif_ctrl *dpmaif_ctrl,
> return 0;
>
> err_unmap_skbs:
>- while (--i > 0)
>+ while (--i >= 0)
> t7xx_unmap_bat_skb(dpmaif_ctrl->dev, bat_req->bat_skb, i);
>
> return ret;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists