netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/9] net: ip: add drop reasons to input route

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADxym3bUKBuMkaG3NiQHavkgScLxRAgkSSmk-KbuYpMepSYDzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 09:35:24 +0800
From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, 
	dsahern@...nel.org, pablo@...filter.org, kadlec@...filter.org, 
	roopa@...dia.com, razor@...ckwall.org, gnault@...hat.com, 
	bigeasy@...utronix.de, idosch@...dia.com, ast@...nel.org, 
	dongml2@...natelecom.cn, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org, 
	bridge@...ts.linux.dev, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/9] net: ip: add drop reasons to input route

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 8:03 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 17:33:39 +0800 Menglong Dong wrote:
> > In this series, we mainly add some skb drop reasons to the input path of
> > ip routing, and we make the following functions return drop reasons:
> >
> >   fib_validate_source()
> >   ip_route_input_mc()
> >   ip_mc_validate_source()
> >   ip_route_input_slow()
> >   ip_route_input_rcu()
> >   ip_route_input_noref()
> >   ip_route_input()
> >   ip_mkroute_input()
> >   __mkroute_input()
> >   ip_route_use_hint()
> >
> > And following new skb drop reasons are added:
> >
> >   SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_LOCAL_SOURCE
> >   SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_INVALID_SOURCE
> >   SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_LOCALNET
> >   SKB_DROP_REASON_IP_INVALID_DEST
>
> We're "a bit" behind on patches after my vacation, so no real review
> here, but please repost with net-next in the subject. The test
> automation trusts the tree designation and bpf-next is no longer
> based on net-next. So this doesn't apply.

I was wondering how the conflict, which was checked by bpf-ci,
happened, as there was no conflict between this series and
net-next. And now I see, I just tagged a wrong branch for this
series. Sorry about that, and I'll resend it to the right branch.

Thanks!
Menglong Dong


> --
> pw-bot: cr