lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4bc30e2c-a0ba-4ccb-baf6-c76425b7995b@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 13:43:16 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Mohsin Bashir <mohsin.bashr@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, alexanderduyck@...com, kuba@...nel.org,
	andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com, kernel-team@...a.com, sanmanpradhan@...a.com,
	sdf@...ichev.me, vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev, hmohsin@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] eth: fbnic: Add support to write TCE TCAM
 entries

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 05:51:53PM -0700, Mohsin Bashir wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 

> Basically, in addition to the RX TCAM (RPC) that you mentioned, we
> also have a TCAM on the TX path that enables traffic redirection for
> BMC. Unlike other NICs where BMC diversion is typically handled by
> firmware, FBNIC firmware does not touch anything host-related. In
> this patch, we are writing MACDA entries from the RPC (Rx Parser and
> Classifier) to the TX TCAM, allowing us to reroute any host traffic
> destined for BMC.

Two TCAMs, that makes a bit more sense.

But why is this hooked into set_rx_mode? It is nothing to do with RX.
I assume you have some mechanism to get the MAC address of the BMC. I
would of thought you need to write one entry into the TCAM during
probe, and you are done?

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ