[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PAXPR04MB8510F0A3B49E05554D5BD71188552@PAXPR04MB8510.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 01:33:15 +0000
From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com"
<edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "andrew+netdev@...n.ch"
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net] net: enetc: prevent VF from configuring preemptiable
TCs
> 802.1Q spells 'preemptible' using 'i', 802.3 spells it using 'a', you
> decided to spell it using both :)
>
My bad, I'll fix the typo
> FWIW, the kernel uses 'preemptible' because 802.1Q is the authoritative
> standard for this feature, 802.3 just references it.
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 04:21:17PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> > Both ENETC PF and VF drivers share enetc_setup_tc_mqprio() to configure
> > MQPRIO. And enetc_setup_tc_mqprio() calls
> enetc_change_preemptible_tcs()
> > to configure preemptible TCs. However, only PF is able to configure
> > preemptible TCs. Because only PF has related registers, while VF does not
> > have these registers. So for VF, its hw->port pointer is NULL. Therefore,
> > VF will access an invalid pointer when accessing a non-existent register,
> > which will cause a call trace issue. The call trace log is shown below.
> >
> > root@...028ardb:~# tc qdisc add dev eno0vf0 parent root handle 100: \
> > mqprio num_tc 4 map 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 queues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 hw 1
> > [ 187.290775] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
> 0000000000001f00
> > [ 187.298760] Mem abort info:
> > [ 187.301607] ESR = 0x0000000096000004
> > [ 187.305373] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> > [ 187.310714] SET = 0, FnV = 0
> > [ 187.313778] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> > [ 187.316923] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
> > [ 187.321818] Data abort info:
> > [ 187.324701] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000
> > [ 187.330207] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
> > [ 187.335278] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
> > [ 187.340610] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs,
> pgdp=0000002084b71000
> > [ 187.347076] [0000000000001f00] pgd=0000000000000000,
> p4d=0000000000000000
> > [ 187.353900] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT
> SMP
> > [ 187.360188] Modules linked in: xt_conntrack xt_addrtype cfg80211 rfkill
> snd_soc_hdmi_codec fsl_jr_uio caam_jr caamkeyblob_desc caamhash_desc
> caamalg_descp
> > [ 187.406320] CPU: 0 PID: 1117 Comm: tc Not tainted
> 6.6.52-gfbb48d8e2ddb #1
> > [ 187.413131] Hardware name: LS1028A RDB Board (DT)
> > [ 187.417846] pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS
> BTYPE=--)
> > [ 187.424831] pc : enetc_mm_commit_preemptible_tcs+0x1c4/0x400
> > [ 187.430518] lr : enetc_mm_commit_preemptible_tcs+0x30c/0x400
> > [ 187.436195] sp : ffff800084a4b400
> > [ 187.439515] x29: ffff800084a4b400 x28: 0000000000000004 x27:
> ffff6a58c5229808
> > [ 187.446679] x26: 0000000080000203 x25: ffff800085218600 x24:
> 0000000000000004
> > [ 187.453842] x23: ffff6a58c42e4a00 x22: ffff6a58c5229808 x21:
> ffff6a58c42e4980
> > [ 187.461004] x20: ffff6a58c5229800 x19: 0000000000001f00 x18:
> 0000000000000001
> > [ 187.468167] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15:
> 0000000000000000
> > [ 187.475328] x14: 00000000000003f8 x13: 0000000000000400 x12:
> 0000000000065feb
> > [ 187.482491] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: ffff6a593f6f9918 x9 :
> 0000000000000000
> > [ 187.489653] x8 : ffff800084a4b668 x7 : 0000000000000003 x6 :
> 0000000000000001
> > [ 187.496815] x5 : 0000000000001f00 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 :
> 0000000000000000
> > [ 187.503977] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000200 x0 :
> ffffd2fbd8497460
> > [ 187.511140] Call trace:
> > [ 187.513588] enetc_mm_commit_preemptible_tcs+0x1c4/0x400
> > [ 187.518918] enetc_setup_tc_mqprio+0x180/0x214
> > [ 187.523374] enetc_vf_setup_tc+0x1c/0x30
> > [ 187.527306] mqprio_enable_offload+0x144/0x178
> > [ 187.531766] mqprio_init+0x3ec/0x668
> > [ 187.535351] qdisc_create+0x15c/0x488
> > [ 187.539023] tc_modify_qdisc+0x398/0x73c
> > [ 187.542958] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x128/0x378
> > [ 187.547064] netlink_rcv_skb+0x60/0x130
> > [ 187.550910] rtnetlink_rcv+0x18/0x24
> > [ 187.554492] netlink_unicast+0x300/0x36c
> > [ 187.558425] netlink_sendmsg+0x1a8/0x420
> > [ 187.562358] ____sys_sendmsg+0x214/0x26c
> > [ 187.566292] ___sys_sendmsg+0xb0/0x108
> > [ 187.570050] __sys_sendmsg+0x88/0xe8
> > [ 187.573634] __arm64_sys_sendmsg+0x24/0x30
> > [ 187.577742] invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114
> > [ 187.581503] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0
> > [ 187.586222] do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28
> > [ 187.589544] el0_svc+0x40/0xe4
> > [ 187.592607] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x12c
> > [ 187.596976] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194
> > [ 187.600648] Code: d65f03c0 d283e005 8b050273 14000050
> (b9400273)
> > [ 187.606759] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>
> Please be more succint with the stack trace. Nobody cares about more
> than this:
Okay, thanks
>
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000001f00
> Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> Hardware name: LS1028A RDB Board (DT)
> pc : enetc_mm_commit_preemptible_tcs+0x1c4/0x400
> lr : enetc_mm_commit_preemptible_tcs+0x30c/0x400
> Call trace:
> enetc_mm_commit_preemptible_tcs+0x1c4/0x400
> enetc_setup_tc_mqprio+0x180/0x214
> enetc_vf_setup_tc+0x1c/0x30
> mqprio_enable_offload+0x144/0x178
> mqprio_init+0x3ec/0x668
> qdisc_create+0x15c/0x488
> tc_modify_qdisc+0x398/0x73c
> rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x128/0x378
> netlink_rcv_skb+0x60/0x130
>
> >
> > Fixes: 827145392a4a ("net: enetc: only commit preemptible TCs to
> hardware when MM TX is active")
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > index c09370eab319..c9f7b7b4445f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_port_mac_wr);
> > static void enetc_change_preemptible_tcs(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv,
> > u8 preemptible_tcs)
> > {
> > + if (!enetc_si_is_pf(priv->si))
> > + return;
> > +
>
> Actually please do this instead:
>
> if (!(si->hw_features & ENETC_SI_F_QBU))
>
> We also shouldn't do anything here for those PFs which do not support frame
> preemption (eno1, eno3 on LS1028A). It won't crash like it does for VFs,
> but we should still avoid accessing registers which aren't implemented.
> The ethtool mm ops are protected using this test, but I didn't realize
> that tc has its own separate entry point which needs it too.
>
Yeah, I agree with you, I will use your solution, thanks.
> > priv->preemptible_tcs = preemptible_tcs;
> > enetc_mm_commit_preemptible_tcs(priv);
> > }
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists