netdev - [PATCH net] bnxt_en: ethtool: Fix ip[6] ntuple rule verification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <219859e674ef7a9d8af9ab4f64a9095580f04bcc.1730436983.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 22:58:30 -0600
From: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
To: davem@...emloft.net,
	michael.chan@...adcom.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	vikas.gupta@...adcom.com,
	andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com,
	martin.lau@...ux.dev
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: [PATCH net] bnxt_en: ethtool: Fix ip[6] ntuple rule verification

Previously, trying to insert an ip or ip6 only rule would get rejected
with -EOPNOTSUPP. For example, the following would fail:

    ethtool -N eth0 flow-type ip6 dst-ip $IP6 context 1

The reason was that all the l4proto validation was being run despite the
l4proto mask being set to 0x0.  Fix by only running l4proto validation
when mask is set.

Fixes: 9ba0e56199e3 ("bnxt_en: Enhance ethtool ntuple support for ip flows besides TCP/UDP")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c
index f71cc8188b4e..1c97ee406bd7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c
@@ -1289,10 +1289,13 @@ static int bnxt_add_l2_cls_rule(struct bnxt *bp,
 static bool bnxt_verify_ntuple_ip4_flow(struct ethtool_usrip4_spec *ip_spec,
 					struct ethtool_usrip4_spec *ip_mask)
 {
+	u8 mproto = ip_mask->proto;
+	u8 sproto = ip_spec->proto;
+
 	if (ip_mask->l4_4_bytes || ip_mask->tos ||
 	    ip_spec->ip_ver != ETH_RX_NFC_IP4 ||
-	    ip_mask->proto != BNXT_IP_PROTO_FULL_MASK ||
-	    (ip_spec->proto != IPPROTO_RAW && ip_spec->proto != IPPROTO_ICMP))
+	    (mproto && mproto != BNXT_IP_PROTO_FULL_MASK) ||
+	    (mproto && sproto != IPPROTO_RAW && sproto != IPPROTO_ICMP))
 		return false;
 	return true;
 }
@@ -1300,10 +1303,12 @@ static bool bnxt_verify_ntuple_ip4_flow(struct ethtool_usrip4_spec *ip_spec,
 static bool bnxt_verify_ntuple_ip6_flow(struct ethtool_usrip6_spec *ip_spec,
 					struct ethtool_usrip6_spec *ip_mask)
 {
+	u8 mproto = ip_mask->l4_proto;
+	u8 sproto = ip_spec->l4_proto;
+
 	if (ip_mask->l4_4_bytes || ip_mask->tclass ||
-	    ip_mask->l4_proto != BNXT_IP_PROTO_FULL_MASK ||
-	    (ip_spec->l4_proto != IPPROTO_RAW &&
-	     ip_spec->l4_proto != IPPROTO_ICMPV6))
+	    (mproto && mproto != BNXT_IP_PROTO_FULL_MASK) ||
+	    (mproto && sproto != IPPROTO_RAW && sproto != IPPROTO_ICMPV6))
 		return false;
 	return true;
 }
-- 
2.46.0