[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zykn6Hr0lpqyPBPR@LQ3V64L9R2>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 12:00:40 -0800
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
hdanton@...a.com, pabeni@...hat.com, namangulati@...gle.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, amritha.nambiar@...el.com,
sridhar.samudrala@...el.com, sdf@...ichev.me, peter@...eblog.net,
m2shafiei@...terloo.ca, bjorn@...osinc.com, hch@...radead.org,
willy@...radead.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
skhawaja@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
Martin Karsten <mkarsten@...terloo.ca>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux BPF <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 7/7] docs: networking: Describe irq suspension
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 12:21:02PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com> writes:
>
> > Thanks for the feedback. I had been preparing a v6 based on Bagas'
> > comments below where you snipped about in the documentation, etc.
> >
> > Should I continue to prepare a v6? It would only contain
> > documentation changes in this patch; I can't really tell if a v6 is
> > necessary or not.
>
> Look at the generated docs and be sure that results are what you expect;
> the enumerated-list change may be necessary.
Right, of course. I just did that and taking Bagas' suggestion does
make the enumerated list look better, so I'll send a v6 with that
change shortly.
Thanks for the guidance.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists