netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: Add missing per-arch include path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bjyvpa6h.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 11:25:58 +0100
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
To: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org,
	Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>@codeaurora.org
Cc: andrii@...nel.org, eddyz87@...il.com, mykolal@...com,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bjorn@...osinc.com,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, charlie@...osinc.com, Andreas Schwab
 <schwab@...e.de>, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
 <palmer@...belt.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: Add missing per-arch include path

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org writes:

> Hello:
>
> This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
> by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>:
>
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 15:13:52 +0200 you wrote:
>> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>
>> 
>> libbpf does not include the per-arch tools include path, e.g.
>> tools/arch/riscv/include. Some architectures depend those files to
>> build properly.
>> 
>> Include tools/arch/$(SUBARCH)/include in the libbpf build.
>> 
>> [...]
>
> Here is the summary with links:
>   - [bpf-next,1/2] libbpf: Add missing per-arch include path
>     https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/710fbca820c7
>   - [bpf-next,2/2] selftests: bpf: Add missing per-arch include path
>     https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/19090f0306f1

Andrii, I just noted that this landed into bpf-next, and not bpf
(fixes).

RISC-V libbpf/perf needs this fix in 6.12 to properly build. Would it be
possible to have it in the bpf tree, and have it land in 6.12-rc7?

Andreas that has a similar fix [1].


Björn

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/mvm5xq44bqh.fsf@suse.de/