[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241104172612.6e5c1a14@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 17:26:12 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Feng Wang <wangfe@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, steffen.klassert@...unet.com,
antony.antony@...unet.com, leonro@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests: rtnetlink: add ipsec packet offload test
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:33:15 -0800 Feng Wang wrote:
> From: wangfe <wangfe@...gle.com>
>
> Duplicating kci_test_ipsec_offload to create a packet offload test.
> Using the netdevsim as a device for testing ipsec packet mode.
> Test the XFRM commands for setting up IPsec hardware packet offloads,
> especially configuring the XFRM interface ID.
CI appears to not be on board:
# 26.29 [+0.07] RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported
# 26.36 [+0.07] FAIL: ipsec_packet_offload can't create SA
https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net/results/846081/25-rtnetlink-sh/stdout
Maybe you need to add more options to tools/testing/selftests/net/config
But stepping back - I think it may be time to move the crypto tunnel
tests based on netdevsim to
tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/netdevsim ? rtnetlink is our main
netlink family, likely half of all our tests could be called a
"rtnetlink test".
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists