[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7b8b83b4-f745-4f3b-8cac-2f190937667a@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 12:25:48 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
horms@...nel.org, dsahern@...nel.org, pablo@...filter.org,
kadlec@...filter.org, roopa@...dia.com, razor@...ckwall.org,
gnault@...hat.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de, hawk@...nel.org,
idosch@...dia.com, dongml2@...natelecom.cn, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, bridge@...ts.linux.dev, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next v4 8/9] net: ip: make
ip_mkroute_input/__mkroute_input return drop reasons
On 10/30/24 02:41, Menglong Dong wrote:
> @@ -1820,7 +1822,8 @@ static int __mkroute_input(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct fib_result *res,
> */
> if (out_dev == in_dev &&
> IN_DEV_PROXY_ARP_PVLAN(in_dev) == 0) {
> - err = -EINVAL;
> + /* what do we name this situation? */
> + reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_ARP_PVLAN_DISABLE;
I don't have a better suggestion :(
Please drop the comment and re-iterate the question in the commit
message after a '---' separator, so we can merge the patch unmodified if
nobody suggests a better one.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists