[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36a5e3a0-258e-4771-905b-227b74fbe5fe@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 17:22:54 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 7/8] rtnetlink: Convert RTM_NEWLINK to
per-netns RTNL.
On 11/5/24 03:05, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> @@ -6995,7 +7017,8 @@ static struct pernet_operations rtnetlink_net_ops = {
> };
>
> static const struct rtnl_msg_handler rtnetlink_rtnl_msg_handlers[] __initconst = {
> - {.msgtype = RTM_NEWLINK, .doit = rtnl_newlink},
> + {.msgtype = RTM_NEWLINK, .doit = rtnl_newlink,
> + .flags = RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_PERNET},
The above causes a lockdep splat in many selftests:
https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net-dbg/results/846801/12-bareudp-sh/stderr
the problem is in rtnl_newlink():
#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
if (!ops) {
__rtnl_unlock();
// we no more under the rtnlock
request_module("rtnl-link-%s", kind);
rtnl_lock();
ops = rtnl_link_ops_get(kind, &ops_srcu_index);
}
#endif
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists