[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <79463950-3acf-45a0-a7fa-30a9c9236292@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:31:44 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To: Yi Zou <03zouyi09.25@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: 21210240012@...udan.edu.cn, 21302010073@...udan.edu.cn,
dsahern@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, kuba@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: route: fix possible null-pointer-dereference in
ip6_route_info_create
On 10/31/24 9:58 PM, Yi Zou wrote:
> In the ip6_route_info_create function, the variable fib6_nh is
> assigned the return value of nexthop_fib6_nh(rt->nh), which could
> result in fib6_nh being NULL. Immediately after this assignment,
not really. IPv6 can only have nexthops in the IPv6 address family, and
nexthop_mpath_select will never return NULL since `0` is always valid
index if the group exists.
> there is a potential dereference of fib6_nh in the following code:
> if (!ipv6_addr_any(&cfg->fc_prefsrc)) {
> struct net_device *dev = fib6_nh->fib_nh_dev;
> This lead to a null pointer dereference (NPD) risk if fib6_nh is
> NULL. The issue can be resolved by adding a NULL check before the
> deference line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Zou <03zouyi09.25@...il.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/route.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index b4251915585f..919592fa4e64 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -3821,7 +3821,7 @@ static struct fib6_info *ip6_route_info_create(struct fib6_config *cfg,
> rt->fib6_flags = RTF_REJECT | RTF_NONEXTHOP;
> }
>
> - if (!ipv6_addr_any(&cfg->fc_prefsrc)) {
> + if (!ipv6_addr_any(&cfg->fc_prefsrc) && fib6_nh) {
> struct net_device *dev = fib6_nh->fib_nh_dev;
>
> if (!ipv6_chk_addr(net, &cfg->fc_prefsrc, dev, 0)) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists