netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 03/12] selftests: ncdevmem: Unify error handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZymRNJLLDLCqIYyq@mini-arch>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:29:56 -0800
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	shuah@...nel.org, horms@...nel.org, almasrymina@...gle.com,
	willemb@...gle.com, petrm@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 03/12] selftests: ncdevmem: Unify error
 handling

On 11/04, Joe Damato wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:14:21AM -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > There is a bunch of places where error() calls look out of place.
> > Use the same error(1, errno, ...) pattern everywhere.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/net/ncdevmem.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ncdevmem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ncdevmem.c
> > index 3e7ef2eedd60..4733d1a0aab5 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ncdevmem.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ncdevmem.c
> > @@ -339,33 +339,33 @@ int do_server(struct memory_buffer *mem)
> >  	server_sin.sin_port = htons(atoi(port));
> >  
> >  	ret = inet_pton(server_sin.sin_family, server_ip, &server_sin.sin_addr);
> > -	if (socket < 0)
> > -		error(79, 0, "%s: [FAIL, create socket]\n", TEST_PREFIX);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		error(1, errno, "%s: [FAIL, create socket]\n", TEST_PREFIX);
> >  
> >  	socket_fd = socket(server_sin.sin_family, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
> > -	if (socket < 0)
> > -		error(errno, errno, "%s: [FAIL, create socket]\n", TEST_PREFIX);
> > +	if (socket_fd < 0)
> > +		error(1, errno, "%s: [FAIL, create socket]\n", TEST_PREFIX);
> >  
> >  	ret = setsockopt(socket_fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEPORT, &opt,
> >  			 sizeof(opt));
> >  	if (ret)
> > -		error(errno, errno, "%s: [FAIL, set sock opt]\n", TEST_PREFIX);
> > +		error(1, errno, "%s: [FAIL, set sock opt]\n", TEST_PREFIX);
> >  
> >  	ret = setsockopt(socket_fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &opt,
> >  			 sizeof(opt));
> >  	if (ret)
> > -		error(errno, errno, "%s: [FAIL, set sock opt]\n", TEST_PREFIX);
> > +		error(1, errno, "%s: [FAIL, set sock opt]\n", TEST_PREFIX);
> 
> A minor nit (definitely not worth re-sending for this on its own):
> it might be helpful to add which of the sockopts failed to the error
> message REUSEADDR or REUSEPORT.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>

Thank you for the review!

I later move these two under enable_reuseaddr and make it even less
debuggable :-( Let me maybe keep the calls to error() inside the
enable_reuseaddr.