[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iKUnrHuf=V8uYNU5jBy7=sQByH4B0hZ=c4+G3oZzF4BnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 10:34:49 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
dsahern@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, joel.granados@...nel.org,
kuba@...nel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, horms@...nel.org, pablo@...filter.org,
kadlec@...filter.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
ij@...nel.org, ncardwell@...gle.com, koen.de_schepper@...ia-bell-labs.com,
g.white@...lelabs.com, ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com,
mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com, cheshire@...le.com, rs.ietf@....at,
Jason_Livingood@...cast.com, vidhi_goel@...le.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 02/13] tcp: create FLAG_TS_PROGRESS
On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 11:07 AM <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com> wrote:
>
> From: Ilpo Järvinen <ij@...nel.org>
>
> Whenever timestamp advances, it declares progress which
> can be used by the other parts of the stack to decide that
> the ACK is the most recent one seen so far.
>
> AccECN will use this flag when deciding whether to use the
> ACK to update AccECN state or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ij@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chia-Yu Chang <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists