[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241106180839.6df5c40e@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 18:08:39 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paul Greenwalt
<paul.greenwalt@...el.com>, Alice Michael <alice.michael@...el.com>, Eric
Joyner <eric.joyner@...el.com>, Alexander Lobakin
<aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>, Pucha Himasekhar Reddy
<himasekharx.reddy.pucha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/15] ice: Add E830 checksum offload support
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:23:35 -0800 Tony Nguyen wrote:
> +static netdev_features_t
> +ice_fix_features_gcs(struct net_device *netdev, netdev_features_t features)
> +{
> + if (!((features & NETIF_F_HW_CSUM) && (features & NETIF_F_ALL_TSO)))
> + return features;
> +
> + if (netdev->features & NETIF_F_HW_CSUM) {
> + netdev_warn(netdev, "Dropping TSO. TSO and HW checksum are mutually exclusive.\n");
> + features &= ~NETIF_F_ALL_TSO;
> + } else {
> + netdev_warn(netdev, "Dropping HW checksum. TSO and HW checksum are mutually exclusive.\n");
> + features &= ~NETIF_F_HW_CSUM;
> + }
why dropping what the user requested with a warning and not just return
an error from ice_set_features()?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists