lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_dhcQGtBtutCuwiKhjZ-Lw1Oxc15d1CrHs4Tf7r5keB0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 16:08:27 -0500
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, 
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: fix possible UAF in sctp_v6_available()

On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 2:20 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> A lockdep report [1] with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y hints
> that sctp_v6_available() is calling dev_get_by_index_rcu()
> and ipv6_chk_addr() without holding rcu.
>
> [1]
>  =============================
>  WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
>  6.12.0-rc5-virtme #1216 Tainted: G        W
>  -----------------------------
>  net/core/dev.c:876 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
>  1 lock held by sctp_hello/31495:
>  #0: ffff9f1ebbdb7418 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sctp_bind (./arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:27 net/sctp/socket.c:315) sctp
>
> stack backtrace:
>  CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 31495 Comm: sctp_hello Tainted: G        W          6.12.0-rc5-virtme #1216
>  Tainted: [W]=WARN
>  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
>  Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>  dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123)
>  lockdep_rcu_suspicious (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6822)
>  dev_get_by_index_rcu (net/core/dev.c:876 (discriminator 7))
>  sctp_v6_available (net/sctp/ipv6.c:701) sctp
>  sctp_do_bind (net/sctp/socket.c:400 (discriminator 1)) sctp
>  sctp_bind (net/sctp/socket.c:320) sctp
>  inet6_bind_sk (net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:465)
>  ? security_socket_bind (security/security.c:4581 (discriminator 1))
>  __sys_bind (net/socket.c:1848 net/socket.c:1869)
>  ? do_user_addr_fault (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:347 ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:880 ./include/linux/mm.h:729 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1340)
>  ? do_user_addr_fault (./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:84 (discriminator 13) ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:98 (discriminator 13) ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:882 (discriminator 13) ./include/linux/mm.h:729 (discriminator 13) arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1340 (discriminator 13))
>  __x64_sys_bind (net/socket.c:1877 (discriminator 1) net/socket.c:1875 (discriminator 1) net/socket.c:1875 (discriminator 1))
>  do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 (discriminator 1) arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 (discriminator 1))
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
>  RIP: 0033:0x7f59b934a1e7
>  Code: 44 00 00 48 8b 15 39 8c 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb bd 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 b8 31 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 09 8c 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> All code
> ========
>    0:   44 00 00                add    %r8b,(%rax)
>    3:   48 8b 15 39 8c 0c 00    mov    0xc8c39(%rip),%rdx        # 0xc8c43
>    a:   f7 d8                   neg    %eax
>    c:   64 89 02                mov    %eax,%fs:(%rdx)
>    f:   b8 ff ff ff ff          mov    $0xffffffff,%eax
>   14:   eb bd                   jmp    0xffffffffffffffd3
>   16:   66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00    cs nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
>   1d:   00 00 00
>   20:   0f 1f 00                nopl   (%rax)
>   23:   b8 31 00 00 00          mov    $0x31,%eax
>   28:   0f 05                   syscall
>   2a:*  48 3d 01 f0 ff ff       cmp    $0xfffffffffffff001,%rax         <-- trapping instruction
>   30:   73 01                   jae    0x33
>   32:   c3                      ret
>   33:   48 8b 0d 09 8c 0c 00    mov    0xc8c09(%rip),%rcx        # 0xc8c43
>   3a:   f7 d8                   neg    %eax
>   3c:   64 89 01                mov    %eax,%fs:(%rcx)
>   3f:   48                      rex.W
>
> Code starting with the faulting instruction
> ===========================================
>    0:   48 3d 01 f0 ff ff       cmp    $0xfffffffffffff001,%rax
>    6:   73 01                   jae    0x9
>    8:   c3                      ret
>    9:   48 8b 0d 09 8c 0c 00    mov    0xc8c09(%rip),%rcx        # 0xc8c19
>   10:   f7 d8                   neg    %eax
>   12:   64 89 01                mov    %eax,%fs:(%rcx)
>   15:   48                      rex.W
>  RSP: 002b:00007ffe2d0ad398 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000031
>  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe2d0ad3d0 RCX: 00007f59b934a1e7
>  RDX: 000000000000001c RSI: 00007ffe2d0ad3d0 RDI: 0000000000000005
>  RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000
>  R10: 00007f59b9253298 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007ffe2d0ada61
>  R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000562926516dd8 R15: 00007f59b9479000
>   </TASK>
>
> Fixes: 6fe1e52490a9 ("sctp: check ipv6 addr with sk_bound_dev if set")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Acked-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>

> ---
>  net/sctp/ipv6.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> index f7b809c0d142c0e6c8e29c2badc4428648117f31..38e2fbdcbeac4bf3185d98f8acae4aea531ca140 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> @@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ static int sctp_v6_available(union sctp_addr *addr, struct sctp_sock *sp)
>         struct sock *sk = &sp->inet.sk;
>         struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
>         struct net_device *dev = NULL;
> -       int type;
> +       int type, res, bound_dev_if;
>
>         type = ipv6_addr_type(in6);
>         if (IPV6_ADDR_ANY == type)
> @@ -697,14 +697,21 @@ static int sctp_v6_available(union sctp_addr *addr, struct sctp_sock *sp)
>         if (!(type & IPV6_ADDR_UNICAST))
>                 return 0;
>
> -       if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if) {
> -               dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, sk->sk_bound_dev_if);
> +       rcu_read_lock();
> +       bound_dev_if = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_bound_dev_if);
> +       if (bound_dev_if) {
> +               res = 0;
> +               dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, bound_dev_if);
>                 if (!dev)
> -                       return 0;
> +                       goto out;
>         }
>
> -       return ipv6_can_nonlocal_bind(net, &sp->inet) ||
> -              ipv6_chk_addr(net, in6, dev, 0);
> +       res = ipv6_can_nonlocal_bind(net, &sp->inet) ||
> +             ipv6_chk_addr(net, in6, dev, 0);
> +
> +out:
> +       rcu_read_unlock();
> +       return res;
>  }
>
>  /* This function checks if the address is a valid address to be used for
> --
> 2.47.0.277.g8800431eea-goog
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ