netdev - Re: [PATCH] mptcp: fix possible integer overflow in mptcp_reset_tout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5f51673a-e19b-45e8-bb1c-a6d3427213c1@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:43:48 +0100
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Kandybka <d.kandybka@...il.com>
Cc: mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 lvc-project@...uxtesting.org, Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@...dex.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mptcp: fix possible integer overflow in
 mptcp_reset_tout_timer

Hi Dmitry,

On 07/11/2024 11:36, Dmitry Kandybka wrote:
> In 'mptcp_reset_tout_timer', promote 'probe_timestamp' to unsigned long
> to avoid possible integer overflow. Compile tested only.
> 
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kandybka <d.kandybka@...il.com>
> ---
>  net/mptcp/protocol.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index e978e05ec8d1..ff2b8a2bfe18 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -2722,8 +2722,8 @@ void mptcp_reset_tout_timer(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned long fail_tout)
>  	if (!fail_tout && !inet_csk(sk)->icsk_mtup.probe_timestamp)
>  		return;
>  
> -	close_timeout = inet_csk(sk)->icsk_mtup.probe_timestamp - tcp_jiffies32 + jiffies +
> -			mptcp_close_timeout(sk);
> +	close_timeout = (unsigned long)inet_csk(sk)->icsk_mtup.probe_timestamp -
> +			tcp_jiffies32 + jiffies + mptcp_close_timeout(sk);

If I'm not mistaken, "jiffies" is an "unsigned long", which makes this
modification not necessary, no?

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.