[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD4GDZzjcrMrnxW0BvtarkM08sV=61H52YZwKbY=QgN9Eqcc9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:00:23 +0000
From: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>
To: Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 7/8] tools/net/ynl: Add retry limit for async notification
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 at 10:04, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Jakub, is it okay to submit this as a single patch, or would you
> prefer me to actually revert 1bf70e6c3a53? (there's about 5 lines
> retained from the original patch).
I'll submit it as a series with a revert and a new patch. The patch is
much cleaner that way.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists