netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v8 00/12] selftests: ncdevmem: Add ncdevmem to ksft

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zy1m3IkTR6GKObKE@mini-arch>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 17:18:20 -0800
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	shuah@...nel.org, horms@...nel.org, almasrymina@...gle.com,
	willemb@...gle.com, petrm@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 00/12] selftests: ncdevmem: Add ncdevmem to
 ksft

On 11/07, Joe Damato wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 10:11:59AM -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > The goal of the series is to simplify and make it possible to use
> > ncdevmem in an automated way from the ksft python wrapper.
> > 
> > ncdevmem is slowly mutated into a state where it uses stdout
> > to print the payload and the python wrapper is added to
> > make sure the arrived payload matches the expected one.
> > 
> > v8:
> > - move error() calls into enable_reuseaddr() (Joe)
> > - bail out when number of queues is 1 (Joe)
> 
> Thanks for all the work on the refactor; sorry for the nit-picking
> on the queue counts. I just thought of it because in my test for
> busy poll stuff, netdevsim uses 1 queue.
> 
> Having tests like this factored nicely really helps when people
> (like me) go to try to write a test for the first time and have a
> good example like this to follow :)

No worries, thanks for taking the time to review! nit-picks are fine
as wells since they are usually the easiest ones to address :-D