[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55fc6114-7e64-4b65-86d2-92cfd1e9e92f@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 13:07:57 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: mrpre <mrpre@....com>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...adoghq.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix recursive lock when verdict program return
SK_PASS
On 11/8/24 1:03 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 11/6/24 4:44 AM, mrpre wrote:
>> When the stream_verdict program returns SK_PASS, it places the received skb
>> into its own receive queue, but a recursive lock eventually occurs, leading
>> to an operating system deadlock. This issue has been present since v6.9.
>>
>> '''
>> sk_psock_strp_data_ready
>> write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock)
>> strp_data_ready
>> strp_read_sock
>> read_sock -> tcp_read_sock
>> strp_recv
>> cb.rcv_msg -> sk_psock_strp_read
>> # now stream_verdict return SK_PASS without peer sock assign
>> __SK_PASS = sk_psock_map_verd(SK_PASS, NULL)
>> sk_psock_verdict_apply
>> sk_psock_skb_ingress_self
>> sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue
>> sk_psock_data_ready
>> read_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock) <= dead lock
>>
>> '''
>>
>> This topic has been discussed before, but it has not been fixed.
>> Previous discussion:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/6684a5864ec86_403d20898@john.notmuch
>
> Is the selftest included in this link still useful to reproduce this bug?
> If yes, please include that also.
>
>>
>> Fixes: 6648e613226e ("bpf, skmsg: Fix NULL pointer dereference in
>> sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue")
>> Reported-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...adoghq.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@....com>
>
> Please also use the real name in the author (i.e. the email sender). The patch
> needs a real author name also. I had manually fixed one of your earlier
> lock_sock fix before applying.
and the bpf mailing list address has a typo in the original patch email... I
fixed that in this reply.
>
> pw-bot: cr
>
>> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
>
> The patch and the earlier discussion make sense to me.
> John and JakubS, please help to take another look in the next respin.
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists