[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZzCY6kD4G2BVDNQs@shredder>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 13:28:42 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Vladimir Vdovin <deliran@...dict.gg>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, shuah@...nel.org,
horms@...nel.org, gnault@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10] net: ipv4: Cache pmtu for all packet paths
if multipath enabled
On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 09:34:24AM +0000, Vladimir Vdovin wrote:
> Check number of paths by fib_info_num_path(),
> and update_or_create_fnhe() for every path.
> Problem is that pmtu is cached only for the oif
> that has received icmp message "need to frag",
> other oifs will still try to use "default" iface mtu.
>
> An example topology showing the problem:
>
> | host1
> +---------+
> | dummy0 | 10.179.20.18/32 mtu9000
> +---------+
> +-----------+----------------+
> +---------+ +---------+
> | ens17f0 | 10.179.2.141/31 | ens17f1 | 10.179.2.13/31
> +---------+ +---------+
> | (all here have mtu 9000) |
> +------+ +------+
> | ro1 | 10.179.2.140/31 | ro2 | 10.179.2.12/31
> +------+ +------+
> | |
> ---------+------------+-------------------+------
> |
> +-----+
> | ro3 | 10.10.10.10 mtu1500
> +-----+
> |
> ========================================
> some networks
> ========================================
> |
> +-----+
> | eth0| 10.10.30.30 mtu9000
> +-----+
> | host2
>
> host1 have enabled multipath and
> sysctl net.ipv4.fib_multipath_hash_policy = 1:
>
> default proto static src 10.179.20.18
> nexthop via 10.179.2.12 dev ens17f1 weight 1
> nexthop via 10.179.2.140 dev ens17f0 weight 1
>
> When host1 tries to do pmtud from 10.179.20.18/32 to host2,
> host1 receives at ens17f1 iface an icmp packet from ro3 that ro3 mtu=1500.
> And host1 caches it in nexthop exceptions cache.
>
> Problem is that it is cached only for the iface that has received icmp,
> and there is no way that ro3 will send icmp msg to host1 via another path.
>
> Host1 now have this routes to host2:
>
> ip r g 10.10.30.30 sport 30000 dport 443
> 10.10.30.30 via 10.179.2.12 dev ens17f1 src 10.179.20.18 uid 0
> cache expires 521sec mtu 1500
>
> ip r g 10.10.30.30 sport 30033 dport 443
> 10.10.30.30 via 10.179.2.140 dev ens17f0 src 10.179.20.18 uid 0
> cache
>
> So when host1 tries again to reach host2 with mtu>1500,
> if packet flow is lucky enough to be hashed with oif=ens17f1 its ok,
> if oif=ens17f0 it blackholes and still gets icmp msgs from ro3 to ens17f1,
> until lucky day when ro3 will send it through another flow to ens17f0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Vdovin <deliran@...dict.gg>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists