[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZzM1/S72Qj0tBCC0@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 12:03:25 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Kees Bakker <kees@...erbout.nl>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfrm: Add support for per cpu xfrm state handling.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 09:42:02PM +0100, Kees Bakker wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
>
> Sorry for the direct email. Did you perhaps forgot a "goto out_cancel" here?
Yes, looks like that. Do you want to send a patch?
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
> [...]
> @@ -2576,6 +2603,8 @@ static int build_aevent(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
> xfrm_state *x, const struct
> err = xfrm_if_id_put(skb, x->if_id);
> if (err)
> goto out_cancel;
> + if (x->pcpu_num != UINT_MAX)
> + err = nla_put_u32(skb, XFRMA_SA_PCPU, x->pcpu_num);
>
> if (x->dir) {
> err = nla_put_u8(skb, XFRMA_SA_DIR, x->dir);
>
> --
> Kees Bakker
Powered by blists - more mailing lists