[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241112182218.GV4507@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 18:22:18 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Manas <manas18244@...td.ac.in>, Jan Karcher <jaka@...ux.ibm.com>,
"D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Anup Sharma <anupnewsmail@...il.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove unused function parameter in __smc_diag_dump
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 08:36:13AM +0100, Wenjia Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 11.11.24 16:10, Manas wrote:
> > On 11.11.2024 15:11, Wenjia Zhang wrote:
...
> > Thank you Wenjia for reviewing this.
> >
> > Should I make any changes to the commit message if we are going forward
> > with it
> > being as a cleanup patch? The commit message itself (barring the cover
> > letter)
> > should be enough, I reckon.
> >
> I think it is ok as it is.
Yes, agreed.
The commit message should be truncated at first scissors ("---").
Which leaves us with a commit message only describing the removal
of an unused function parameter. Which, given the discussion in
this thread, is what we want.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
>
> Thanks,
> Wenjia
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists