[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241111183814.264205a9@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 18:38:14 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Parav Pandit
<parav@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] mlx5/core: relax memory barrier in
eq_update_ci()
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 11:30:51 -0700 Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> The memory barrier in eq_update_ci() after the doorbell write is a
> significant hot spot in mlx5_eq_comp_int(). Under heavy TCP load, we see
> 3% of CPU time spent on the mfence instruction.
Applied, thanks.
In the future please avoid sending patches in reply to older version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists