[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241113203317.2507537-8-cratiu@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 22:30:44 +0200
From: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <jiri@...nulli.us>, <tariqt@...dia.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<saeedm@...dia.com>, <cratiu@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/10] devlink: Allow rate node parents from other devlinks
This commit make use of the unlocked parent devlink from
info->user_ptr[1] to assign a devlink rate node to the requested parent
node. Because it is not locked, none of its mutable fields can be used.
But parent setting only requires:
1. Verifying that the same rate domain is used. The rate domain is
immutable once set, so this is safe.
2. Comparing devlink_rate->devlink with the requested parent devlink.
As the shared devlink rate domain is locked, other entities cannot
concurrently make changes to any of its rates.
Issue: 3645895
Change-Id: Iffd9ccb012c3bd2dec97648161b182679eb5ca78
Signed-off-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
---
net/devlink/rate.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/devlink/rate.c b/net/devlink/rate.c
index daf366ca0575..2f12d65b6709 100644
--- a/net/devlink/rate.c
+++ b/net/devlink/rate.c
@@ -141,6 +141,27 @@ static int devlink_nl_rate_fill(struct sk_buff *msg,
nla_nest_end(msg, nla_tc_bw);
+ if (devlink_rate->parent) {
+ struct devlink_rate *parent = devlink_rate->parent;
+
+ if (nla_put_string(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_RATE_PARENT_NODE_NAME, parent->name))
+ goto nla_put_failure;
+ if (parent->devlink != devlink) {
+ /* The parent devlink isn't locked, but a reference to
+ * it is held so it cannot suddenly disappear.
+ * And since there are rate nodes pointing to it,
+ * the parent devlink is fully initialized and
+ * the fields accessed here are valid and immutable.
+ */
+ if (nla_put_string(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PARENT_DEV_BUS_NAME,
+ parent->devlink->dev->bus->name))
+ goto nla_put_failure;
+ if (nla_put_string(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PARENT_DEV_NAME,
+ dev_name(parent->devlink->dev)))
+ goto nla_put_failure;
+ }
+ }
+
genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
return 0;
@@ -292,9 +313,17 @@ devlink_nl_rate_parent_node_set(struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate,
const char *parent_name = nla_data(nla_parent);
const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;
size_t len = strlen(parent_name);
+ struct devlink *parent_devlink;
struct devlink_rate *parent;
int err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ parent_devlink = info->user_ptr[1] ? : devlink;
+ if (parent_devlink != devlink) {
+ if (parent_devlink->rate_domain != devlink->rate_domain) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(info->extack, "Cross rate-domain parent is not allowed");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
parent = devlink_rate->parent;
if (parent && !len) {
@@ -312,7 +341,11 @@ devlink_nl_rate_parent_node_set(struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate,
refcount_dec(&parent->refcnt);
devlink_rate->parent = NULL;
} else if (len) {
- parent = devlink_rate_node_get_by_name(devlink, parent_name);
+ /* parent_devlink (if != devlink) isn't locked, but the rate
+ * domain, immutable once set, is already locked and the parent
+ * is only used to determine node owner via pointer comparison.
+ */
+ parent = devlink_rate_node_get_by_name(parent_devlink, parent_name);
if (IS_ERR(parent))
return -ENODEV;
@@ -816,8 +849,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_rate_leaf_destroy);
* devl_rate_nodes_destroy - destroy all devlink rate nodes on device
* @devlink: devlink instance
*
- * Unset parent for all rate objects and destroy all rate nodes
- * on specified device.
+ * Unset parent for all rate objects that involve this device and destroy all
+ * rate nodes on it.
*/
void devl_rate_nodes_destroy(struct devlink *devlink)
{
@@ -828,7 +861,9 @@ void devl_rate_nodes_destroy(struct devlink *devlink)
devl_rate_domain_lock(devlink);
list_for_each_entry(devlink_rate, &devlink->rate_domain->rate_list, list) {
- if (!devlink_rate->parent || devlink_rate->devlink != devlink)
+ if (!devlink_rate->parent ||
+ (devlink_rate->devlink != devlink &&
+ devlink_rate->parent->devlink != devlink))
continue;
refcount_dec(&devlink_rate->parent->refcnt);
@@ -838,6 +873,7 @@ void devl_rate_nodes_destroy(struct devlink *devlink)
else if (devlink_rate_is_node(devlink_rate))
ops->rate_node_parent_set(devlink_rate, NULL, devlink_rate->priv,
NULL, NULL);
+ devlink_rate->parent = NULL;
}
list_for_each_entry_safe(devlink_rate, tmp, &devlink->rate_domain->rate_list, list) {
if (devlink_rate->devlink == devlink && devlink_rate_is_node(devlink_rate)) {
--
2.43.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists