[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce2359c3-a6eb-4ef3-b2cf-321c5c282fab@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 02:17:33 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Yuyang Huang <yuyanghuang@...gle.com>
Cc: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netlink: add igmp join/leave notifications
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 09:56:17AM +0900, Yuyang Huang wrote:
> > Please could you say more about programming hardware offload filters?
> > How is this done?
>
> Sure, please let me explain a little bit further on how Android
> Packet Filter (APF) works here.
>
> The Android Packet Filter (APF) has two parts:
> * APF Interpreter: Runs on the Wi-Fi chipset and executes APF
> programs(bytecodes) to decide whether to accept, drop, or reply to
> incoming packets.
O.K. WiFi is not my area. But i'm more interested in uAPIs, and
ensuring you are not adding APIs which promote kernel bypass.
Is the API to pass this bytestream to the wifi chipset in mainline?
And how does APF differ from BPF? Or P4? Why would we want APF when
mainline has BPF?
Do the new netlink message make sense without APF? Can i write a user
space IGMP snooping implementation and then call bridge mdb
add/del/replace? Assuming i can, why are the WiFi card not using that
API, same a switches do?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists