[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6961dc9c-51bd-4430-ba32-80303e2e3027@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 18:10:15 +0900
From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] can: tcan4x5x: add option for selecting nWKRQ
voltage
On 14/11/2024 at 18:03, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 14.11.2024 13:41:12, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
>> On Thu. 14 Nov. 2024 at 12:37, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> My bad actually, I didn't realize we don't have an X: entries
>>> on net/can/ under general networking in MAINTAINERS.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>
>>> Would you mind if I added them?
>>
>> OK for me. I guess you want to add the exclusion for both the
>>
>> CAN NETWORK DRIVERS
>>
>> and the
>>
>> CAN NETWORK LAYER
>>
>> entries in MAINTAINERS.
>
> I thinks, it's the other way round.
>
> General networking gets an X: for driver/net/can and driver/can/ and the
> include files.
Indeed. Now that you say it, makes perfect sense.
@Jakub, similar to Marc, feel free to add my Acked-by tag when you send
such a patch.
Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol
Powered by blists - more mailing lists