netdev - RE: [PATCH v3 net-next 4/5] net: enetc: add LSO support for i.MX95 ENETC PF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <PAXPR04MB8510772A96D35CA8A6392D91885B2@PAXPR04MB8510.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 01:35:56 +0000
From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
To: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
CC: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>, Vladimir Oltean
	<vladimir.oltean@....com>, Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>,
	"andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "davem@...emloft.net"
	<davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Frank Li <frank.li@....com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 net-next 4/5] net: enetc: add LSO support for i.MX95
 ENETC PF

> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 05:14:46PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> > ENETC rev 4.1 supports large send offload (LSO), segmenting large TCP
> > and UDP transmit units into multiple Ethernet frames. To support LSO,
> > software needs to fill some auxiliary information in Tx BD, such as
> > LSO header length, frame length, LSO maximum segment size, etc.
> >
> > At 1Gbps link rate, TCP segmentation was tested using iperf3, and the
> > CPU performance before and after applying the patch was compared
> > through the top command. It can be seen that LSO saves a significant
> > amount of CPU cycles compared to software TSO.
> >
> > Before applying the patch:
> > %Cpu(s):  0.1 us,  4.1 sy,  0.0 ni, 85.7 id,  0.0 wa,  0.5 hi,  9.7 si
> >
> > After applying the patch:
> > %Cpu(s):  0.1 us,  2.3 sy,  0.0 ni, 94.5 id,  0.0 wa,  0.4 hi,  2.6 si
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
> > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> > ---
> > v2: no changes
> > v3: use enetc_skb_is_ipv6() helper fucntion which is added in patch 2
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c  | 266
> > +++++++++++++++++-  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h  |
> > 15 +  .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h  |  22 ++
> >  .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h   |  15 +-
> >  .../freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c         |   3 +
> >  5 files changed, 311 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > index 7c6b844c2e96..91428bb99f6d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > @@ -527,6 +527,233 @@ static void enetc_tso_complete_csum(struct
> enetc_bdr *tx_ring, struct tso_t *tso
> >  	}
> >  }
> >
> > +static inline int enetc_lso_count_descs(const struct sk_buff *skb) {
> > +	/* 4 BDs: 1 BD for LSO header + 1 BD for extended BD + 1 BD
> > +	 * for linear area data but not include LSO header, namely
> > +	 * skb_headlen(skb) - lso_hdr_len. And 1 BD for gap.
> > +	 */
> > +	return skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags + 4; }
> 
> Why not move this static inline herper into the header?
> 

enetc_lso_count_descs() is only referenced in enetc.c, IMO, there is
no need to move it to enetc.h or or other header files.

> > +
> > +static int enetc_lso_get_hdr_len(const struct sk_buff *skb) {
> > +	int hdr_len, tlen;
> > +
> > +	tlen = skb_is_gso_tcp(skb) ? tcp_hdrlen(skb) : sizeof(struct udphdr);
> > +	hdr_len = skb_transport_offset(skb) + tlen;
> > +
> > +	return hdr_len;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void enetc_lso_start(struct sk_buff *skb, struct enetc_lso_t
> > +*lso) {
> > +	lso->lso_seg_size = skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size;
> > +	lso->ipv6 = enetc_skb_is_ipv6(skb);
> > +	lso->tcp = skb_is_gso_tcp(skb);
> > +	lso->l3_hdr_len = skb_network_header_len(skb);
> > +	lso->l3_start = skb_network_offset(skb);
> > +	lso->hdr_len = enetc_lso_get_hdr_len(skb);
> > +	lso->total_len = skb->len - lso->hdr_len; }
> > +
> > +static void enetc_lso_map_hdr(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring, struct sk_buff
> *skb,
> > +			      int *i, struct enetc_lso_t *lso) {
> > +	union enetc_tx_bd txbd_tmp, *txbd;
> > +	struct enetc_tx_swbd *tx_swbd;
> > +	u16 frm_len, frm_len_ext;
> > +	u8 flags, e_flags = 0;
> > +	dma_addr_t addr;
> > +	char *hdr;
> > +
> > +	/* Get the fisrt BD of the LSO BDs chain */
> 
> s/fisrt/first/

Thanks, I I was not aware of this typo, I will correct it.