[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc284081-8df8-42a5-8f19-8cb1e06d3330@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 16:31:48 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, fw@...len.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] Netfilter fixes for net
On 11/14/24 16:00, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 03:54:56PM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> On 11/14/24 13:57, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>> The following patchset contains Netfilter fixes for net:
>>>
>>> 1) Update .gitignore in selftest to skip conntrack_reverse_clash,
>>> from Li Zhijian.
>>>
>>> 2) Fix conntrack_dump_flush return values, from Guan Jing.
>>>
>>> 3) syzbot found that ipset's bitmap type does not properly checks for
>>> bitmap's first ip, from Jeongjun Park.
>>>
>>> Please, pull these changes from:
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf.git nf-24-11-14
>>
>> Almost over the air collision, I just sent the net PR for -rc8. Do any
>> of the above fixes have a strong need to land into 6.12?
>
> selftests fixes are trivial.
>
> ipset fix would be good to have.
>
> But if this is pushing things too much too the limit on your side,
> then skip.
I would need to take back the already shared net PR. I prefer to avoid
such a thing to avoid confusion with the process, especially for non
critical stuff.
It looks like the ipset fix addresses a quite ancient issue, I
guess/hope it's not extremely critical.
/P
Powered by blists - more mailing lists