[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e5053f9e-3dc7-4a71-9a3a-f8492987f21f@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:36:35 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: John Ousterhout <ouster@...stanford.edu>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/12] Begin upstreaming Homa transport
protocol
On 11/14/24 8:59 AM, John Ousterhout wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 9:08 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 03:39:53PM -0800, John Ousterhout wrote:
>>> MAINTAINERS | 7 +
>>> include/uapi/linux/homa.h | 165 ++++++
>>> net/Kconfig | 1 +
>>> net/Makefile | 1 +
>>> net/homa/Kconfig | 19 +
>>> net/homa/Makefile | 14 +
>>> net/homa/homa_impl.h | 767 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> net/homa/homa_incoming.c | 1076 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> net/homa/homa_outgoing.c | 854 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> net/homa/homa_peer.c | 319 +++++++++++
>>> net/homa/homa_peer.h | 234 ++++++++
>>> net/homa/homa_plumbing.c | 965 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> net/homa/homa_pool.c | 420 +++++++++++++++
>>> net/homa/homa_pool.h | 152 ++++++
>>> net/homa/homa_rpc.c | 488 +++++++++++++++++
>>> net/homa/homa_rpc.h | 446 +++++++++++++++
>>> net/homa/homa_sock.c | 380 +++++++++++++
>>> net/homa/homa_sock.h | 426 +++++++++++++++
>>> net/homa/homa_stub.h | 80 +++
>>> net/homa/homa_timer.c | 156 ++++++
>>> net/homa/homa_utils.c | 150 ++++++
>>> net/homa/homa_wire.h | 378 +++++++++++++
>>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> Thanks for your efforts to push them upstream!
>>
>> Just some very high-level comments:
>>
>> 1. Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl to make sure the coding style is
>> aligned with upstream, since I noticed there are still some C++ style
>> comments in your patchset.
>
> I have been running checkpatch.pl, but it didn't complain about C++
> style comments. Those comments really shouldn't be there, though: they
> are for pieces of code I've temporarily commented out, and those
> chunks shouldn't be in the upstream version of Homa. I'll fix things
> so they don't appear in the future.
>
John, you should be OK using // comments if that's what you want to use.
https://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1607.1/00627.html
or
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFyQYJerovMsSoSKS7PessZBr4vNp-3QUUwhqk4A4_jcbg@mail.gmail.com/
are still current AFAIK.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists