[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01c3b716-1450-4e15-85f5-76985ccf3f13@ijzerbout.nl>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 21:53:19 +0100
From: Kees Bakker <kees@...erbout.nl>
To: Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
jiri@...nulli.us, edumazet@...gle.com, sgoutham@...vell.com,
sbhatta@...vell.com, hkelam@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v12 11/12] octeontx2-pf: Adds TC offload support
Op 07-11-2024 om 17:08 schreef Geetha sowjanya:
> Implements tc offload support for rvu representors.
>
> Usage example:
>
> - Add tc rule to drop packets with vlan id 3 using port
> representor(Rpf1vf0).
>
> # tc filter add dev Rpf1vf0 protocol 802.1Q parent ffff: flower
> vlan_id 3 vlan_ethtype ipv4 skip_sw action drop
>
> - Redirect packets with vlan id 5 and IPv4 packets to eth1,
> after stripping vlan header.
>
> # tc filter add dev Rpf1vf0 ingress protocol 802.1Q flower vlan_id 5
> vlan_ethtype ipv4 skip_sw action vlan pop action mirred ingress
> redirect dev eth1
>
> Signed-off-by: Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>
> ---
> .../marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_fs.c | 14 ++-
> .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_rep.c | 4 +
> .../marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.h | 7 ++
> .../marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_flows.c | 5 -
> .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_tc.c | 25 ++--
> .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/rep.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/rep.h | 1 +
> 7 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_fs.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_fs.c
> index 150635de2bd5..9d08fd466a43 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_fs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_npc_fs.c
> @@ -1416,6 +1416,7 @@ int rvu_mbox_handler_npc_install_flow(struct rvu *rvu,
> struct npc_install_flow_rsp *rsp)
> {
> bool from_vf = !!(req->hdr.pcifunc & RVU_PFVF_FUNC_MASK);
> + bool from_rep_dev = !!is_rep_dev(rvu, req->hdr.pcifunc);
> struct rvu_switch *rswitch = &rvu->rswitch;
> int blkaddr, nixlf, err;
> struct rvu_pfvf *pfvf;
> @@ -1472,14 +1473,19 @@ int rvu_mbox_handler_npc_install_flow(struct rvu *rvu,
> /* AF installing for a PF/VF */
> if (!req->hdr.pcifunc)
(1)
> target = req->vf;
> +
> /* PF installing for its VF */
> - else if (!from_vf && req->vf) {
> + if (!from_vf && req->vf && !from_rep_dev) {
(2)
> target = (req->hdr.pcifunc & ~RVU_PFVF_FUNC_MASK) | req->vf;
> pf_set_vfs_mac = req->default_rule &&
> (req->features & BIT_ULL(NPC_DMAC));
> }
> - /* msg received from PF/VF */
> +
> + /* Representor device installing for a representee */
> + if (from_rep_dev && req->vf)
> + target = req->vf;
This now makes all previous assignments to `target` useless. See (1) and (2)
You created an if-else construct with an assignment to `target` in both
paths.
Can you please check the logic again?
> else
> + /* msg received from PF/VF */
> target = req->hdr.pcifunc;
>
> /* ignore chan_mask in case pf func is not AF, revisit later */
> [...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists