[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <941712.1731947960@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:39:20 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Kees Bakker <kees@...erbout.nl>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@...rosoft.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, netfs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
v9fs@...ts.linux.dev, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/33] netfs: Abstract out a rolling folio buffer implementation
Kees Bakker <kees@...erbout.nl> wrote:
> > + wreq->buffer.iter = wreq->buffer.iter;
> Is this correct, an assignment to itself?
That should just be removed. Both branches of the preceding if-statement set
it.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists