netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] dt-bindings: net: renesas,ether: Drop undocumented "micrel,led-mode"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+=DzjZCDC2OxL4wTueTpFv0o-Ah3RwzPZsbQ8CLFY=qg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:19:45 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, 
	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] dt-bindings: net: renesas,ether: Drop
 undocumented "micrel,led-mode"

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 4:58 PM Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> "micrel,led-mode" is not yet documented by a schema. It's irrelevant to
> the example, so just drop it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,ether.yaml | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

I see this is marked rejected in PW. While there was some discussion,
there aren't any objections to it. While micrel.txt binding is being
converted now, there are some issues (with it and phy bindings in
general). Keeping this property in this example will eventually
require some changes to it. What phy is connected to this ethernet
controller is beyond the scope of this binding, so having a specific
phy is not necessary.

Rob

pw-bot: new