lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZzxK7hZSF7nPfuOj@fedora>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:23:10 +0000
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Sam Edwards <cfsworks@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] selftests/rtnetlink.sh: add mngtempaddr test

On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 12:59:27PM -0800, Sam Edwards wrote:
> Hi Hangbin,
> 
> My apologies, I should have shared my version of the check function
> before. Here it is:
> 
> ```bash
> # Called to validate the addresses on $IFNAME:
> #
> # 1. Every `temporary` address must have a matching `mngtmpaddr`
> # 2. Every `mngtmpaddr` address must have some un`deprecated` `temporary`

Thanks, this is much clear.

> #
> # Fails the whole test script if a problem is detected, else returns silently.
> validate()
> {
>     mng_prefixes=()
>     undep_prefixes=()
>     temp_addrs=()
> 
>     while read -r line; do
>         line_array=($line)
>         address="${line_array[1]}"
>         prefix="$(echo "$address" | cut -d: -f1-4)::/64"
>         if echo "$line" | grep -q mngtmpaddr; then
>             mng_prefixes+=("$prefix")
>         elif echo "$line" | grep -q temporary; then
>             temp_addrs+=("$address")
>             if echo "$line" | grep -qv deprecated; then
>                 undep_prefixes+=("$prefix")
>             fi
>         fi
>     done < <(ip -6 addr show dev $IFNAME | grep '^\s*inet6')
> 
>     # 1. All temporary addresses (temp and dep) must have a matching mngtmpaddr
>     for address in ${temp_addrs[@]}; do
>         prefix="$(echo "$address" | cut -d: -f1-4)::/64"
>         if [[ ! " ${mng_prefixes[*]} " =~ " $prefix " ]]; then
>             echo "FAIL: Temporary $address with no matching mngtmpaddr!";
>             exit 1
>         fi
>     done
> 
>     # 2. All mngtmpaddr addresses must have a temporary address (not dep)
>     for prefix in ${mng_prefixes[@]}; do
>         if [[ ! " ${undep_prefixes[*]} " =~ " $prefix " ]]; then
>             echo "FAIL: No undeprecated temporary in $prefix!";
>             exit 1
>         fi
>     done
> }
> ```
> 
> Of course this is using awful text parsing and not JSON output. But
> the idea is that it groups addresses by their /64 prefix, to confirm
> that every /64 containing a mngtmpaddrs address also contains an
> undeprecated temporary, and that every /64 containing a temporary
> (deprecated or not) contains a mngtmpaddrs.

And I will modify and use your checking version.

> 
> This can be extended for the lifetime checking: when we build the set
> of mngtmpaddrs /64s, we also note the valid/preferred_life_time values
> for each mngtmpaddr. Then later when we confirm rule 1 (all temporary
> addresses must have a matching mngtmpaddr) we also confirm that each
> temporary does not outlive the mngtmpaddr in the same /64.

Since we add all mngtmpaddrs manually, which valid/preferred_life_time
will be forever. So we only need to check the temporary addresses'
valid/preferred_life_time, right? And on the other hand, the preferred_lft
maybe 0 in my example.

    inet6 2001::743:ec1e:5c19:404f/64 scope global temporary dynamic
       valid_lft 25sec preferred_lft 5sec
    inet6 2001::938f:432:f32d:602f/64 scope global temporary dynamic
       valid_lft 19sec preferred_lft 0sec

It looks we only need to check the valid_lft. Am I miss anything?

Thanks
Hangbin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ