[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <673c888f.a70a0220.26ea38.88b1@mx.google.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:46:03 +0100
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
upstream@...oha.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v7 0/4] net: dsa: Add Airoha AN8855 support
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:10:19PM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 11/18/24 19:35, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 04:48:59PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 02:27:55PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> >>> This small series add the initial support for the Airoha AN8855 Switch.
> >>>
> >>> It's a 5 port Gigabit Switch with SGMII/HSGMII upstream port.
> >>>
> >>> This is starting to get in the wild and there are already some router
> >>> having this switch chip.
> >>>
> >>> It's conceptually similar to mediatek switch but register and bits
> >>> are different. And there is that massive Hell that is the PCS
> >>> configuration.
> >>> Saddly for that part we have absolutely NO documentation currently.
> >>>
> >>> There is this special thing where PHY needs to be calibrated with values
> >>> from the switch efuse. (the thing have a whole cpu timer and MCU)
> >>
> >> Have you run the scripts in tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/dsa/?
> >> Could you post the results?
> >
> > Any test in particular? I'm working on adding correct support for them
> > in OpenWrt. Should I expect some to fail?
>
> Unfortunatelly this landed on netdev too close to the merge window. I'll
> unable to apply it on time and process the net-next PR as expected even
> if it would receive ack from the DSA crew right now.
>
> @Christian, you will have to repost it after the merge window.
>
It's ok, just any timeframe? Guess 2 weeks till net-next reopens? (just
to put a remainder on the calendar so I won't forget)
--
Ansuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists