[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241119062543.242dc6a9@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 06:25:43 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Toke
Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>, "Alexei
Starovoitov" <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii@...nel.org>, Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Magnus Karlsson
<magnus.karlsson@...el.com>, <nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@...el.com>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/19] xdp: a fistful of generic changes
(+libeth_xdp)
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:06:56 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > This clearly could be multiple series, please don't go over the limit.
>
> Sorta.
> I think I'll split it into two: changing the current logic + adding new
> functions and libeth_xdp. Maybe I could merge the second one with the
> Chapter IV, will see.
FWIW I was tempted to cherry-pick patches 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7, since they
look uncontroversial and stand on their own. But wasn't 100% sure I'm
not missing a dependency. Then I thought - why take the risk, let me
complain instead :) Easier to make progress with smaller series..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists